16-year-old Matthew warns that there are great dangers as well as benefits from AI
AI has spread across our lives, reshaping how we work and communicate.
19 December 2025
Is AI eroding the humanities – and humanity itself?
Matthew Ng is the one of the winners of the Harbinger Prize 2025. This is his winning entry.
Artificial intelligence is undeniably a gamechanger for both young people and adults. With the help of AI, we’ve been able to aim for the highest of highs, in ways that human beings alone are simply incapable of doing. Its effect has been revolutionary, with many industries and enterprises embracing AI as if it were godsent.
From Amazon and Google to the UnitedHealth Group and Walmart, firms in the Fortune Global 500 list (an annual ranking of the 500 largest corporations in the US by revenue) have surely had to adapt to this new change or be eliminated.
As students, my peers and I are no exception to these drastic changes, as AI penetrates every aspect of our daily lives. For instance, the increasing popularity of generative chatbots such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek and Gemini has been met with heated debate in academia over its controversial use of copyrighted content, as well as the risk it poses to academic integrity. Concerns have also been raised over its possible enabling of plagiarism among students who over-rely on AI to complete tasks and assignments.
Students in the humanities, in subjects such as literature, history or philosophy, are highly likely to take advantage of chatbot assistance given AI’s ability to formulate ideas based on existing information, which is what these disciplines require.
Because of that, I and many of my classmates feel as if we are increasingly disposable; that our talents and skillsets are unable to reach the new standard set by the all-powerful AI. Very often, we feel inadequate because we formulate ideas slower than our artificial counterparts.
The emerging ‘study tools’ that use AI to create resources such as flashcards and quizzes to help with active learning and revision, especially existing platforms such as Quizlet and Notion, are immensely popular among my classmates.
While most people agree that, at its current stage of development, AI has mostly improved their productivity rather than harmed it, we must ask ourselves, where do we draw the line with our use of AI?
Relationship between science and the arts
It doesn’t help that there has been a greater push in education everywhere for STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) subjects as a strategy to encourage students in the world of AI – this really does not address our concerns and only exacerbates them further.
Many US colleges, including the University of Chicago, have announced that they are cutting the number of liberal arts admissions, due to the termination of federal grants for such programmes. This has also happened at Fudan University in Shanghai, a long-time stronghold of the arts and humanities among China’s top schools. This trend of slashing admissions is expected to continue globally.
While AI is not solely to blame for this, we must remain acutely vigilant of its impact on academia. Higher education has always prided itself on the range of disciplines it offers, as institutions seek to diversify through students from different demographics – but I doubt if that will continue to be the case.
Society’s growing preference for the sciences is the tip of the iceberg – the latter is the wider problem of an imbalance between the two disciplines. The sciences and the arts have always been an intersection; they aren’t mutually exclusive, but complement each other.
